vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (GROV) and JD.com, Inc. (JD), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JD.com, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($42.0B vs $42.4M, roughly 990.6× Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc.). JD.com, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.7% vs 2.1%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-62.0K vs $-1.1B). Over the past eight quarters, JD.com, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.0% CAGR vs -11.0%).
Grove Collaborative is a benefit corporation headquartered in San Francisco, with an additional office in Portland, Maine. The company makes and sells its own environmentally friendly home and personal care products under its Grove Co. brand, as well as products from other companies.
JD.com, Inc., also known as JINGDONG, formerly called 360buy, is a Chinese e-commerce company headquartered in Beijing. With revenues more than US158.8 billion in 2024, JD.com is China’s largest retailer by revenue, and ranks 47 on Fortune Global 500. It is one of the two massive B2C online retailers in China by transaction volume and revenue, and is a major competitor to Alibaba-run Tmall. JD.com’s portfolio spans across retail, technology, logistics, health care, industrials, property manag...
GROV vs JD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $42.4M | $42.0B |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $896.0M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | -0.4% |
| Net Margin | -3.7% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 87.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | $42.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.0M | $49.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.5M | $41.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.3M | $37.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $40.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $896.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $937.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 53.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $15.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-17.0M | $42.8B |
| Total Assets | $53.1M | $100.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $15.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $16.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $13.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.8M | $14.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.8M | $11.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.1M | $42.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.0M | $41.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $42.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $42.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.0K | $39.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.6M | $100.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $98.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.8M | $93.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.2M | $91.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.8M | $89.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-29.0K | $-1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-62.0K | $-1.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -2.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -1.26× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $5.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-29.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0K | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.9M | $-2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $750.0K | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-62.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0K | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.4M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-95.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.0K | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.0% | -6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GROV
| Third Party Products | $23.4M | 55% |
| Grove Brands | $19.0M | 45% |
JD
| JD Retail | $35.2B | 84% |
| Other | $4.6B | 11% |
| New Businesses | $2.2B | 5% |
