vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $72.0M, roughly 2.0× Globalstar, Inc.). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -16.1%, a 41.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
GSAT vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
