vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Phreesia, Inc. (PHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phreesia, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.3M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.7× Globalstar, Inc.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -16.1%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 12.7%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
GSAT vs PHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $120.3M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | 129.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $654.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $106.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | $3.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $320.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $423.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $90.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $320.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $423.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $408.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $400.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 22.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
