vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.4× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -16.1%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
GSAT vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
SILA
Segment breakdown not available.
