vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Planet Image International Ltd (YIBO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Planet Image International Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.7M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.1× Globalstar, Inc.). Planet Image International Ltd runs the higher net margin — -0.3% vs -16.1%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Planet Labs PBC, known as "Planet.", is a publicly traded American Earth imaging company based in San Francisco, California. Their goal is to image the entirety of the Earth daily to monitor changes and pinpoint trends.
GSAT vs YIBO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $80.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $-213.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $74.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $77.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $-213.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $54.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | $8.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $57.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $154.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $54.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $53.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $154.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $140.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $139.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $2.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
YIBO
Segment breakdown not available.
