vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globalstar, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($72.0M vs $37.9M, roughly 1.9× Zevia PBC). Zevia PBC runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -16.1%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globalstar, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.6% vs -4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Globalstar, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Zevia is a Los Angeles based company that produces soft drinks, organic tea, energy drinks, and mixers sweetened with stevia. All Zevia products are zero-calorie, sugar-free, gluten free, vegan, certified kosher, and certified by The Non-GMO Project. In June 2021, Zevia filed to go public with an IPO.
GSAT vs ZVIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $37.9M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | 80.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $51.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $63.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $53.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $80.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $-507.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $-507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $116.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $282.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
ZVIA
Segment breakdown not available.
