vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE) and LIFETIME BRANDS, INC (LCUT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LIFETIME BRANDS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($204.1M vs $124.4M, roughly 1.6× GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC.). LIFETIME BRANDS, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs -113.4%, a 122.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LIFETIME BRANDS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.2% vs -15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, LIFETIME BRANDS, INC's revenue compounded faster (19.8% CAGR vs -11.1%).

Gran Tierra Energy is an energy company founded by Jeffrey Scott, Dana Coffield, Max Wei, Jim Hart and Rafael Orunesu in May 2005. The company, based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, focuses on oil and gas exploration, development and production, particularly in South America. The company announced its intentions to merge with Solana Resources on 29 July 2008.

Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.

GTE vs LCUT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LCUT
LCUT
1.6× larger
LCUT
$204.1M
$124.4M
GTE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LCUT
LCUT
+10.3% gap
LCUT
-5.2%
-15.5%
GTE
Higher net margin
LCUT
LCUT
122.3% more per $
LCUT
8.9%
-113.4%
GTE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LCUT
LCUT
Annualised
LCUT
19.8%
-11.1%
GTE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Revenue
$124.4M
$204.1M
Net Profit
$-141.1M
$18.2M
Gross Margin
38.6%
Operating Margin
-142.9%
9.8%
Net Margin
-113.4%
8.9%
Revenue YoY
-15.5%
-5.2%
Net Profit YoY
-312.6%
103.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.98
$0.83

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$124.4M
$204.1M
Q3 25
$149.3M
$171.9M
Q2 25
$152.5M
$131.9M
Q1 25
$170.5M
$140.1M
Q4 24
$147.3M
$215.2M
Q3 24
$151.4M
$183.8M
Q2 24
$165.6M
$141.7M
Q1 24
$157.6M
$142.2M
Net Profit
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$-141.1M
$18.2M
Q3 25
$-19.9M
$-1.2M
Q2 25
$-12.7M
$-39.7M
Q1 25
$-19.3M
$-4.2M
Q4 24
$-34.2M
$8.9M
Q3 24
$1.1M
$344.0K
Q2 24
$36.4M
$-18.2M
Q1 24
$-78.0K
$-6.3M
Gross Margin
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
35.1%
Q2 25
38.6%
Q1 25
36.1%
Q4 24
37.7%
Q3 24
36.7%
Q2 24
38.5%
Q1 24
40.5%
Operating Margin
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
-142.9%
9.8%
Q3 25
-20.9%
3.9%
Q2 25
-5.3%
-28.2%
Q1 25
-9.2%
0.8%
Q4 24
-14.9%
7.2%
Q3 24
14.5%
4.7%
Q2 24
16.5%
0.8%
Q1 24
11.0%
1.3%
Net Margin
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
-113.4%
8.9%
Q3 25
-13.4%
-0.7%
Q2 25
-8.4%
-30.1%
Q1 25
-11.3%
-3.0%
Q4 24
-23.2%
4.1%
Q3 24
0.7%
0.2%
Q2 24
22.0%
-12.8%
Q1 24
-0.0%
-4.4%
EPS (diluted)
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$-3.98
$0.83
Q3 25
$-0.57
$-0.05
Q2 25
$-0.36
$-1.83
Q1 25
$-0.54
$-0.19
Q4 24
$-1.10
$0.41
Q3 24
$0.04
$0.02
Q2 24
$1.16
$-0.85
Q1 24
$0.00
$-0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$82.9M
$4.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$686.5M
$135.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$228.7M
$202.3M
Total Assets
$1.6B
$572.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.00×
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$82.9M
$4.3M
Q3 25
$49.1M
$12.1M
Q2 25
$61.0M
$12.0M
Q1 25
$76.6M
$10.4M
Q4 24
$103.4M
$2.9M
Q3 24
$277.6M
$6.0M
Q2 24
$115.3M
$3.4M
Q1 24
$126.6M
$4.6M
Total Debt
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$686.5M
$135.0M
Q3 25
$761.8M
Q2 25
$772.6M
Q1 25
$726.3M
Q4 24
$722.1M
$142.5M
Q3 24
$718.4M
Q2 24
$582.1M
Q1 24
$583.1M
Stockholders' Equity
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$228.7M
$202.3M
Q3 25
$366.0M
$184.6M
Q2 25
$389.8M
$185.8M
Q1 25
$393.8M
$225.7M
Q4 24
$413.6M
$229.9M
Q3 24
$420.9M
$220.9M
Q2 24
$420.9M
$219.8M
Q1 24
$392.0M
$223.7M
Total Assets
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$1.6B
$572.6M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$581.1M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$551.9M
Q1 25
$1.7B
$594.6M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$634.3M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$668.7M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$617.0M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$602.7M
Debt / Equity
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
3.00×
0.67×
Q3 25
2.08×
Q2 25
1.98×
Q1 25
1.84×
Q4 24
1.75×
0.62×
Q3 24
1.71×
Q2 24
1.38×
Q1 24
1.49×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$157.2M
$3.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$3.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$157.2M
$3.7M
Q3 25
$48.1M
$-22.2M
Q2 25
$34.7M
$9.3M
Q1 25
$73.2M
$16.7M
Q4 24
$26.6M
$20.3M
Q3 24
$78.7M
$-22.7M
Q2 24
$73.2M
$10.4M
Q1 24
$60.8M
$10.5M
Free Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
$2.6M
Q3 25
$-22.7M
Q2 25
$8.2M
Q1 25
$15.1M
Q4 24
$19.7M
Q3 24
$-23.2M
Q2 24
$9.9M
Q1 24
$9.9M
FCF Margin
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
1.3%
Q3 25
-13.2%
Q2 25
6.2%
Q1 25
10.8%
Q4 24
9.1%
Q3 24
-12.6%
Q2 24
7.0%
Q1 24
7.0%
Capex Intensity
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
0.6%
Q3 25
0.3%
Q2 25
0.9%
Q1 25
1.1%
Q4 24
0.3%
Q3 24
0.3%
Q2 24
0.4%
Q1 24
0.4%
Cash Conversion
GTE
GTE
LCUT
LCUT
Q4 25
0.21×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
2.28×
Q3 24
69.42×
-65.89×
Q2 24
2.01×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTE
GTE

Colombia Segment$89.1M72%
Other$22.9M18%
Ecuador Segment$12.5M10%

LCUT
LCUT

Kitchenware$114.3M56%
Tableware$41.7M20%
Home Solutions$29.4M14%
Other$18.8M9%

Related Comparisons