vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE) and MARCUS CORP (MCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MARCUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($193.5M vs $124.4M, roughly 1.6× GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC.). On growth, MARCUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs -15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MARCUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -11.1%).

Gran Tierra Energy is an energy company founded by Jeffrey Scott, Dana Coffield, Max Wei, Jim Hart and Rafael Orunesu in May 2005. The company, based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, focuses on oil and gas exploration, development and production, particularly in South America. The company announced its intentions to merge with Solana Resources on 29 July 2008.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is an American company that provides real estate brokerage, mortgage brokerage, research, and advisory services in the U.S. and Canada in the field of commercial property. It popularized the practice of listing properties exclusively with one brokerage firm. The company has over 1,800 employees in more than 80 offices across the U.S. and Canada.

GTE vs MCS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MCS
MCS
1.6× larger
MCS
$193.5M
$124.4M
GTE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MCS
MCS
+18.3% gap
MCS
2.8%
-15.5%
GTE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MCS
MCS
Annualised
MCS
18.2%
-11.1%
GTE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Revenue
$124.4M
$193.5M
Net Profit
$-141.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-142.9%
0.9%
Net Margin
-113.4%
Revenue YoY
-15.5%
2.8%
Net Profit YoY
-312.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.98

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$124.4M
$193.5M
Q3 25
$149.3M
$210.2M
Q2 25
$152.5M
$206.0M
Q1 25
$170.5M
$148.8M
Q4 24
$147.3M
$188.3M
Q3 24
$151.4M
$232.7M
Q2 24
$165.6M
$176.0M
Q1 24
$157.6M
$138.5M
Net Profit
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$-141.1M
Q3 25
$-19.9M
$16.2M
Q2 25
$-12.7M
$7.3M
Q1 25
$-19.3M
$-16.8M
Q4 24
$-34.2M
$986.0K
Q3 24
$1.1M
$23.3M
Q2 24
$36.4M
$-20.2M
Q1 24
$-78.0K
$-11.9M
Operating Margin
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
-142.9%
0.9%
Q3 25
-20.9%
10.8%
Q2 25
-5.3%
6.3%
Q1 25
-9.2%
-13.7%
Q4 24
-14.9%
-1.2%
Q3 24
14.5%
14.1%
Q2 24
16.5%
1.3%
Q1 24
11.0%
-12.0%
Net Margin
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
-113.4%
Q3 25
-13.4%
7.7%
Q2 25
-8.4%
3.6%
Q1 25
-11.3%
-11.3%
Q4 24
-23.2%
0.5%
Q3 24
0.7%
10.0%
Q2 24
22.0%
-11.5%
Q1 24
-0.0%
-8.6%
EPS (diluted)
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$-3.98
Q3 25
$-0.57
Q2 25
$-0.36
Q1 25
$-0.54
Q4 24
$-1.10
Q3 24
$0.04
Q2 24
$1.16
Q1 24
$0.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$82.9M
$23.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$686.5M
$159.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$228.7M
$457.4M
Total Assets
$1.6B
$1.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.00×
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$82.9M
$23.4M
Q3 25
$49.1M
$7.4M
Q2 25
$61.0M
$14.9M
Q1 25
$76.6M
$11.9M
Q4 24
$103.4M
$40.8M
Q3 24
$277.6M
$28.4M
Q2 24
$115.3M
$32.8M
Q1 24
$126.6M
$17.3M
Total Debt
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$686.5M
$159.0M
Q3 25
$761.8M
$162.0M
Q2 25
$772.6M
$179.9M
Q1 25
$726.3M
$198.9M
Q4 24
$722.1M
$159.1M
Q3 24
$718.4M
$173.1M
Q2 24
$582.1M
$175.7M
Q1 24
$583.1M
$169.8M
Stockholders' Equity
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$228.7M
$457.4M
Q3 25
$366.0M
$454.3M
Q2 25
$389.8M
$448.4M
Q1 25
$393.8M
$441.8M
Q4 24
$413.6M
$464.9M
Q3 24
$420.9M
$462.3M
Q2 24
$420.9M
$449.4M
Q1 24
$392.0M
$459.3M
Total Assets
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$1.6B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.4B
$1.0B
Debt / Equity
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
3.00×
0.35×
Q3 25
2.08×
0.36×
Q2 25
1.98×
0.40×
Q1 25
1.84×
0.45×
Q4 24
1.75×
0.34×
Q3 24
1.71×
0.37×
Q2 24
1.38×
0.39×
Q1 24
1.49×
0.37×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$157.2M
$48.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$26.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$989.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$157.2M
$48.8M
Q3 25
$48.1M
$39.1M
Q2 25
$34.7M
$31.6M
Q1 25
$73.2M
$-35.3M
Q4 24
$26.6M
$52.6M
Q3 24
$78.7M
$30.5M
Q2 24
$73.2M
$36.0M
Q1 24
$60.8M
$-15.1M
Free Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$26.4M
Q3 25
$18.2M
Q2 25
$14.7M
Q1 25
$-58.3M
Q4 24
$27.1M
Q3 24
$12.0M
Q2 24
$16.1M
Q1 24
$-30.5M
FCF Margin
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
13.6%
Q3 25
8.7%
Q2 25
7.1%
Q1 25
-39.2%
Q4 24
14.4%
Q3 24
5.2%
Q2 24
9.2%
Q1 24
-22.0%
Capex Intensity
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
9.9%
Q2 25
8.2%
Q1 25
15.5%
Q4 24
13.5%
Q3 24
7.9%
Q2 24
11.3%
Q1 24
11.1%
Cash Conversion
GTE
GTE
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
4.32×
Q1 25
Q4 24
53.31×
Q3 24
69.42×
1.31×
Q2 24
2.01×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTE
GTE

Colombia Segment$89.1M72%
Other$22.9M18%
Ecuador Segment$12.5M10%

MCS
MCS

Theatres$123.1M64%
Concessions$51.0M26%
Food And Beverage$21.2M11%

Related Comparisons