vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE) and PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC (PFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.2M vs $124.4M, roughly 1.8× GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC.). PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC runs the higher net margin — 35.3% vs -113.4%, a 148.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES INC's revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -11.1%).

Gran Tierra Energy is an energy company founded by Jeffrey Scott, Dana Coffield, Max Wei, Jim Hart and Rafael Orunesu in May 2005. The company, based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, focuses on oil and gas exploration, development and production, particularly in South America. The company announced its intentions to merge with Solana Resources on 29 July 2008.

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. is an American bank holding company and financial services corporation based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Its banking subsidiary, PNC Bank, operates in 27 states and the District of Columbia, with 2,629 branches and 9,523 ATMs. PNC Bank is one of the largest banks in the US by assets and by number of branches, deposits, and ATMs.

GTE vs PFS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PFS
PFS
1.8× larger
PFS
$225.2M
$124.4M
GTE
Higher net margin
PFS
PFS
148.7% more per $
PFS
35.3%
-113.4%
GTE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PFS
PFS
Annualised
PFS
17.3%
-11.1%
GTE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Revenue
$124.4M
$225.2M
Net Profit
$-141.1M
$79.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-142.9%
Net Margin
-113.4%
35.3%
Revenue YoY
-15.5%
Net Profit YoY
-312.6%
24.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.98
$0.61

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
$225.2M
Q4 25
$124.4M
$225.7M
Q3 25
$149.3M
$221.8M
Q2 25
$152.5M
$214.2M
Q1 25
$170.5M
$208.8M
Q4 24
$147.3M
$205.9M
Q3 24
$151.4M
$210.6M
Q2 24
$165.6M
$163.8M
Net Profit
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
$79.4M
Q4 25
$-141.1M
Q3 25
$-19.9M
$71.7M
Q2 25
$-12.7M
$72.0M
Q1 25
$-19.3M
$64.0M
Q4 24
$-34.2M
Q3 24
$1.1M
$46.4M
Q2 24
$36.4M
$-11.5M
Operating Margin
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-142.9%
49.7%
Q3 25
-20.9%
45.8%
Q2 25
-5.3%
47.8%
Q1 25
-9.2%
44.0%
Q4 24
-14.9%
30.5%
Q3 24
14.5%
31.0%
Q2 24
16.5%
-13.0%
Net Margin
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
35.3%
Q4 25
-113.4%
Q3 25
-13.4%
32.3%
Q2 25
-8.4%
33.6%
Q1 25
-11.3%
30.7%
Q4 24
-23.2%
Q3 24
0.7%
22.0%
Q2 24
22.0%
-7.0%
EPS (diluted)
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
$0.61
Q4 25
$-3.98
$0.64
Q3 25
$-0.57
$0.55
Q2 25
$-0.36
$0.55
Q1 25
$-0.54
$0.49
Q4 24
$-1.10
$0.37
Q3 24
$0.04
$0.36
Q2 24
$1.16
$-0.11

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$82.9M
$222.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$686.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$228.7M
$2.9B
Total Assets
$1.6B
$25.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
$222.1M
Q4 25
$82.9M
$209.1M
Q3 25
$49.1M
$299.2M
Q2 25
$61.0M
$258.0M
Q1 25
$76.6M
$234.1M
Q4 24
$103.4M
$205.9M
Q3 24
$277.6M
$244.0M
Q2 24
$115.3M
$290.5M
Total Debt
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$686.5M
Q3 25
$761.8M
Q2 25
$772.6M
Q1 25
$726.3M
Q4 24
$722.1M
Q3 24
$718.4M
Q2 24
$582.1M
Stockholders' Equity
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$228.7M
$2.8B
Q3 25
$366.0M
$2.8B
Q2 25
$389.8M
$2.7B
Q1 25
$393.8M
$2.7B
Q4 24
$413.6M
$2.6B
Q3 24
$420.9M
$2.6B
Q2 24
$420.9M
$2.6B
Total Assets
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
$25.2B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$25.0B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$24.8B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$24.5B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$24.2B
Q4 24
$1.7B
$24.1B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$24.0B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$24.1B
Debt / Equity
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.00×
Q3 25
2.08×
Q2 25
1.98×
Q1 25
1.84×
Q4 24
1.75×
Q3 24
1.71×
Q2 24
1.38×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$157.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$157.2M
$442.3M
Q3 25
$48.1M
$98.0M
Q2 25
$34.7M
$186.8M
Q1 25
$73.2M
$88.5M
Q4 24
$26.6M
$426.4M
Q3 24
$78.7M
$69.2M
Q2 24
$73.2M
$76.5M
Free Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$430.7M
Q3 25
$96.7M
Q2 25
$182.6M
Q1 25
$87.4M
Q4 24
$425.1M
Q3 24
$67.9M
Q2 24
$75.5M
FCF Margin
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
190.8%
Q3 25
43.6%
Q2 25
85.2%
Q1 25
41.9%
Q4 24
206.4%
Q3 24
32.2%
Q2 24
46.1%
Capex Intensity
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.1%
Q3 25
0.6%
Q2 25
2.0%
Q1 25
0.5%
Q4 24
0.6%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
0.6%
Cash Conversion
GTE
GTE
PFS
PFS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
1.37×
Q2 25
2.59×
Q1 25
1.38×
Q4 24
Q3 24
69.42×
1.49×
Q2 24
2.01×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTE
GTE

Colombia Segment$89.1M72%
Other$22.9M18%
Ecuador Segment$12.5M10%

PFS
PFS

Net Interest Income$193.7M86%
Noninterest Income$31.5M14%

Related Comparisons