vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE) and Proto Labs Inc (PRLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Proto Labs Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($139.3M vs $124.4M, roughly 1.1× GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC.). Proto Labs Inc runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -113.4%, a 119.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Proto Labs Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.4% vs -15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Proto Labs Inc's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs -11.1%).

Gran Tierra Energy is an energy company founded by Jeffrey Scott, Dana Coffield, Max Wei, Jim Hart and Rafael Orunesu in May 2005. The company, based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, focuses on oil and gas exploration, development and production, particularly in South America. The company announced its intentions to merge with Solana Resources on 29 July 2008.

Protolabs is a company that provides rapid manufacturing of 3D printed, CNC-machined, sheet metal, and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and production. Markets like medical devices, aerospace, electronics, appliances, automotive and consumer products use these parts. Protolabs' headquarters are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota, with Minnesota-based manufacturing facilities in Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, and Rosemount, along with additional facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire and Ca...

GTE vs PRLB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PRLB
PRLB
1.1× larger
PRLB
$139.3M
$124.4M
GTE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRLB
PRLB
+25.9% gap
PRLB
10.4%
-15.5%
GTE
Higher net margin
PRLB
PRLB
119.2% more per $
PRLB
5.8%
-113.4%
GTE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PRLB
PRLB
Annualised
PRLB
5.3%
-11.1%
GTE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Revenue
$124.4M
$139.3M
Net Profit
$-141.1M
$8.1M
Gross Margin
45.6%
Operating Margin
-142.9%
7.1%
Net Margin
-113.4%
5.8%
Revenue YoY
-15.5%
10.4%
Net Profit YoY
-312.6%
125.4%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.98
$0.29

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$139.3M
Q4 25
$124.4M
$136.5M
Q3 25
$149.3M
$135.4M
Q2 25
$152.5M
$135.1M
Q1 25
$170.5M
$126.2M
Q4 24
$147.3M
$121.8M
Q3 24
$151.4M
$125.6M
Q2 24
$165.6M
$125.6M
Net Profit
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$8.1M
Q4 25
$-141.1M
Q3 25
$-19.9M
$7.2M
Q2 25
$-12.7M
$4.4M
Q1 25
$-19.3M
$3.6M
Q4 24
$-34.2M
Q3 24
$1.1M
$7.2M
Q2 24
$36.4M
$4.5M
Gross Margin
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
45.6%
Q4 25
44.2%
Q3 25
45.3%
Q2 25
44.3%
Q1 25
44.1%
Q4 24
42.7%
Q3 24
45.6%
Q2 24
45.0%
Operating Margin
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
7.1%
Q4 25
-142.9%
5.0%
Q3 25
-20.9%
6.5%
Q2 25
-5.3%
3.7%
Q1 25
-9.2%
3.6%
Q4 24
-14.9%
-1.2%
Q3 24
14.5%
6.8%
Q2 24
16.5%
4.8%
Net Margin
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
5.8%
Q4 25
-113.4%
Q3 25
-13.4%
5.3%
Q2 25
-8.4%
3.3%
Q1 25
-11.3%
2.9%
Q4 24
-23.2%
Q3 24
0.7%
5.7%
Q2 24
22.0%
3.6%
EPS (diluted)
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$0.29
Q4 25
$-3.98
$0.25
Q3 25
$-0.57
$0.30
Q2 25
$-0.36
$0.18
Q1 25
$-0.54
$0.15
Q4 24
$-1.10
$-0.01
Q3 24
$0.04
$0.29
Q2 24
$1.16
$0.18

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$82.9M
$124.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$686.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$228.7M
$683.1M
Total Assets
$1.6B
$778.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$124.0M
Q4 25
$82.9M
$128.1M
Q3 25
$49.1M
$119.2M
Q2 25
$61.0M
$103.2M
Q1 25
$76.6M
$96.8M
Q4 24
$103.4M
$103.1M
Q3 24
$277.6M
$100.5M
Q2 24
$115.3M
$112.9M
Total Debt
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$686.5M
Q3 25
$761.8M
Q2 25
$772.6M
Q1 25
$726.3M
Q4 24
$722.1M
Q3 24
$718.4M
Q2 24
$582.1M
Stockholders' Equity
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$683.1M
Q4 25
$228.7M
$673.9M
Q3 25
$366.0M
$664.7M
Q2 25
$389.8M
$664.7M
Q1 25
$393.8M
$656.8M
Q4 24
$413.6M
$670.2M
Q3 24
$420.9M
$680.0M
Q2 24
$420.9M
$685.2M
Total Assets
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$778.6M
Q4 25
$1.6B
$763.4M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$756.9M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$743.3M
Q1 25
$1.7B
$737.5M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$743.5M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$753.8M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$758.2M
Debt / Equity
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.00×
Q3 25
2.08×
Q2 25
1.98×
Q1 25
1.84×
Q4 24
1.75×
Q3 24
1.71×
Q2 24
1.38×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$157.2M
$17.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.16×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
$17.5M
Q4 25
$157.2M
$16.5M
Q3 25
$48.1M
$29.1M
Q2 25
$34.7M
$10.6M
Q1 25
$73.2M
$18.4M
Q4 24
$26.6M
$17.3M
Q3 24
$78.7M
$24.8M
Q2 24
$73.2M
$14.4M
Free Cash Flow
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$8.4M
Q3 25
$25.0M
Q2 25
$9.1M
Q1 25
$17.1M
Q4 24
$16.5M
Q3 24
$23.2M
Q2 24
$10.2M
FCF Margin
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
6.2%
Q3 25
18.5%
Q2 25
6.7%
Q1 25
13.6%
Q4 24
13.5%
Q3 24
18.5%
Q2 24
8.2%
Capex Intensity
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.9%
Q3 25
3.0%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
1.0%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
1.2%
Q2 24
3.3%
Cash Conversion
GTE
GTE
PRLB
PRLB
Q1 26
2.16×
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.03×
Q2 25
2.39×
Q1 25
5.11×
Q4 24
Q3 24
69.42×
3.44×
Q2 24
2.01×
3.18×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTE
GTE

Colombia Segment$89.1M72%
Other$22.9M18%
Ecuador Segment$12.5M10%

PRLB
PRLB

CNC Machining$63.2M45%
Injection Molding$51.1M37%
3D Printing$20.5M15%
Sheet Metal$4.4M3%
Other Revenue$207.0K0%

Related Comparisons