vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. (GTEC) and INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC (ISSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.9M vs $21.8M, roughly 1.1× INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC). INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs -6.6%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.6% vs 23.4%). Over the past eight quarters, INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC's revenue compounded faster (42.5% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp is a specialized developer and manufacturer of electric industrial vehicles, lithium-ion drivetrain systems and industrial clean energy solutions. Its core products include electric forklifts and electric construction equipment components, serving logistics, construction and industrial customers across North America and Asia Pacific.
Motorola Solutions, Inc., is an American technology company that provides safety and security products and services. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, the company provides critical communications, video security, and command center technologies, used by public safety agencies and enterprises. It was formed in 2011 by the division of Motorola, Inc., and is its legal successor; the former company's mobile phone division was spun off as Motorola Mobility, now part of Chinese technology company...
GTEC vs ISSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.9M | $21.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $4.1M |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.1% | 28.9% |
| Net Margin | -6.6% | 18.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.4% | 36.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -120.8% | 451.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $21.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.7M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $736.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-684.4K | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 53.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 52.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 31.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.56 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.18 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.2M | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $72.9M | $68.7M |
| Total Assets | $115.8M | $109.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $601.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $604.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7M | $539.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $521.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.8M | $574.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $72.9M | $68.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.4M | $64.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.2M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.1M | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.3M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $41.4M |
| Q4 25 | $115.8M | $109.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.4M | $103.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.6M | $89.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.2M | $57.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.8M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 32.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $445.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $934.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $201.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-267.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $299.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $730.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.6M | $75.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.3% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.31× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 2.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.37× | 0.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTEC
| Transmission Boxes For Forklift | $23.1M | 97% |
| Other | $758.3K | 3% |
ISSC
| Products | $13.6M | 62% |
| Services | $8.2M | 38% |
