vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. (GTEC) and Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.2M vs $23.9M, roughly 1.1× Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.). Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. runs the higher net margin — -6.6% vs -80.5%, a 73.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Greenland Technologies Holding Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.4% vs -8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Greenland Technologies Holding Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp is a specialized developer and manufacturer of electric industrial vehicles, lithium-ion drivetrain systems and industrial clean energy solutions. Its core products include electric forklifts and electric construction equipment components, serving logistics, construction and industrial customers across North America and Asia Pacific.
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers. It is a subsidiary of Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust. As of December 31, 2022, the company owned 19 properties with 2.9 million square feet of leasable space primarily in the Northeastern United States, including 7 properties in Pennsylvania. The company's major tenants are TJX Companies, Kohl's, Shaw's, Dollar Tree, and Walmart. The only notable property owned by the company is The Shoppes at T...
GTEC vs WHLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.9M | $25.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.6M | $-819.0K |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.1% | 42.2% |
| Net Margin | -6.6% | -80.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.4% | -8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -120.8% | -102.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-3.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $24.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.0M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.7M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | $-819.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $509.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-684.4K | $-33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $-8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 42.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.7% | 57.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 56.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | -80.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 48.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.8% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | 3374.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.6% | -134.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | -19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | -33.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-3.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $-9.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $-22.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.56 | $-202743.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-129727.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $-11554.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.18 | $-2459.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.2M | $23.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $72.9M | $234.0K |
| Total Assets | $115.8M | $601.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.2M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.0M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.7M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.8M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $479.2M |
| Q4 25 | $72.9M | $234.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.2M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.1M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.3M | $-36.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $-29.0M |
| Q4 25 | $115.8M | $601.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.4M | $625.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.6M | $625.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.6M | $624.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | $653.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.5M | $673.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $670.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.2M | $667.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.8M | $21.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 68.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $10.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.8M | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $715.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.6M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.3% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 27.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 16.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.31× | 8.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.37× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTEC
| Transmission Boxes For Forklift | $23.1M | 97% |
| Other | $758.3K | 3% |
WHLR
Segment breakdown not available.
