vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Good Times Restaurants Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.7M vs $18.6M, roughly 1.8× Hanover Bancorp, Inc.). Good Times Restaurants Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs 0.2%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hanover Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.3% vs -10.0%). Hanover Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.2M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Hanover Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs -0.7%).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
Hanover Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S. regional bank holding company based in Maryland. It offers retail and commercial banking services including deposits, business loans, mortgages, personal lending and wealth management, serving consumers, SMEs and local groups across Maryland and adjacent mid-Atlantic markets.
GTIM vs HNVR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $33.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 3.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -99.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $16.5M |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $33.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $844.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | $4.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 32.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 24.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $208.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $200.3M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $208.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $164.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $162.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $141.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $141.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $136.5M |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $200.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $201.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | $196.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $189.5M |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | $2.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $13.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 65.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | 395.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | $16.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $-547.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $-876.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 65.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | -26.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | 395.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | 1.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | -0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | -3.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
