vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.1M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.5× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Logistic Properties of the Americas runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs 0.6%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Logistic Properties of the Americas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.4M vs $1.2M).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is a specialized industrial real estate firm that acquires, develops and manages logistics properties across North, Central and South America. Its portfolio includes distribution centers, warehouses and last-mile delivery facilities, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and third-party logistics clients.
GTIM vs LPA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $16.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 81.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 32.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $9.2M |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 81.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $296.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $324.6M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $700.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $296.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $324.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $700.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $21.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 42.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | $12.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $966.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $218.9K |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 47.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 55.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 50.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
