vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.2× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 0.6%, a 54.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -10.0%). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $1.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -0.7%).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
GTIM vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTIM
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
