vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Gitlab Inc. (GTLB) and Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.0M vs $244.4M, roughly 1.0× Gitlab Inc.). Gitlab Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -109.4%, a 106.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gitlab Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.6% vs 22.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Gitlab Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 13.0%).

GitLab Inc. is an American company that operates and develops GitLab, an open-core DevOps software package that can develop, secure, and operate software. GitLab includes a distributed version control system based on Git, including features such as access control, bug tracking, software feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project, as well as snippets.

Hudson Pacific Properties is a real estate investment trust with 15.8 million square feet of office buildings, 1.5 million square feet of sound stages, and undeveloped rights for 3 million square feet of additional commercial property. Its properties are on the West Coast of the United States and Vancouver. It is organized in Maryland and headquartered in Los Angeles. It is the largest independent operator of sound stages in Los Angeles.

GTLB vs HPP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HPP
HPP
1.0× larger
HPP
$256.0M
$244.4M
GTLB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GTLB
GTLB
+2.5% gap
GTLB
24.6%
22.1%
HPP
Higher net margin
GTLB
GTLB
106.0% more per $
GTLB
-3.4%
-109.4%
HPP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GTLB
GTLB
Annualised
GTLB
22.1%
13.0%
HPP

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Revenue
$244.4M
$256.0M
Net Profit
$-8.3M
$-280.2M
Gross Margin
86.8%
Operating Margin
-5.1%
18.6%
Net Margin
-3.4%
-109.4%
Revenue YoY
24.6%
22.1%
Net Profit YoY
-128.0%
-61.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
$256.0M
Q1 26
$181.9M
Q4 25
$244.4M
$256.0M
Q3 25
$236.0M
$186.6M
Q2 25
$214.5M
$190.0M
Q1 25
$211.4M
$198.5M
Q4 24
$196.0M
$209.7M
Q3 24
$182.6M
$200.4M
Net Profit
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
$-280.2M
Q1 26
$-50.9M
Q4 25
$-8.3M
$-280.2M
Q3 25
$-9.2M
$-144.1M
Q2 25
$-35.9M
$-87.8M
Q1 25
$5.8M
$-80.3M
Q4 24
$29.6M
$-173.5M
Q3 24
$12.9M
$-107.0M
Gross Margin
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
86.8%
60.0%
Q3 25
87.9%
44.3%
Q2 25
88.3%
43.1%
Q1 25
89.2%
42.9%
Q4 24
88.7%
44.7%
Q3 24
88.3%
42.7%
Operating Margin
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
18.6%
Q1 26
-7.1%
Q4 25
-5.1%
-109.8%
Q3 25
-7.8%
-77.2%
Q2 25
-16.1%
-46.0%
Q1 25
-9.1%
-40.4%
Q4 24
-14.7%
-83.2%
Q3 24
-22.5%
-52.3%
Net Margin
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
-109.4%
Q1 26
-28.0%
Q4 25
-3.4%
-109.4%
Q3 25
-3.9%
-77.2%
Q2 25
-16.7%
-46.2%
Q1 25
2.7%
-40.5%
Q4 24
15.1%
-82.7%
Q3 24
7.1%
-53.4%
EPS (diluted)
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.05
$-11.57
Q3 25
$-0.06
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-0.22
$-0.41
Q1 25
$0.05
$-0.53
Q4 24
$0.18
$-1.19
Q3 24
$0.08
$-0.69

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$224.2M
$138.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$922.7M
$3.2B
Total Assets
$1.6B
$7.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
$138.4M
Q1 26
$138.0M
Q4 25
$224.2M
$138.4M
Q3 25
$261.4M
$190.4M
Q2 25
$255.7M
$236.0M
Q1 25
$227.6M
$86.5M
Q4 24
$176.6M
$63.3M
Q3 24
$438.6M
$90.7M
Stockholders' Equity
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
$3.2B
Q1 26
$3.1B
Q4 25
$922.7M
$3.0B
Q3 25
$866.6M
$3.2B
Q2 25
$808.3M
$3.4B
Q1 25
$775.9M
$2.8B
Q4 24
$724.7M
$2.9B
Q3 24
$642.8M
$3.0B
Total Assets
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
$7.3B
Q1 26
$7.2B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$7.3B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$7.8B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$8.1B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$8.0B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$8.1B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$8.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$28.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.2%
14.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$242.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$31.4M
$121.0M
Q3 25
$49.4M
$33.2M
Q2 25
$106.3M
$-2.0M
Q1 25
$63.2M
$30.5M
Q4 24
$-177.0M
$164.7M
Q3 24
$11.7M
$63.7M
Free Cash Flow
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$28.4M
Q3 25
$46.5M
Q2 25
$105.4M
Q1 25
$62.1M
Q4 24
$-178.1M
Q3 24
$10.8M
FCF Margin
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
19.7%
Q2 25
49.1%
Q1 25
29.4%
Q4 24
-90.8%
Q3 24
5.9%
Capex Intensity
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
14.0%
Q1 26
18.5%
Q4 25
1.2%
Q3 25
1.2%
Q2 25
0.4%
Q1 25
0.5%
Q4 24
0.5%
Q3 24
0.5%
Cash Conversion
GTLB
GTLB
HPP
HPP
Q3 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
10.89×
Q4 24
-5.99×
Q3 24
0.90×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GTLB
GTLB

Subscription And Circulation$146.4M60%
Subscription Software As A Service$76.9M31%
License$15.5M6%
Professional Services And Other$5.6M2%

HPP
HPP

Rental revenues$216.8M85%
Other$35.6M14%
Service and other revenues$3.7M1%

Related Comparisons