vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and Cloudflare, Inc. (NET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHART INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $614.5M, roughly 1.8× Cloudflare, Inc.). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -2.0%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cloudflare, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.6% vs -2.5%). Cloudflare, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($105.2M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Cloudflare, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.4% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
Cloudflare, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California, that provides a range of internet services, including content delivery network (CDN) services, cloud cybersecurity, DDoS mitigation, and ICANN-accredited domain registration. The company's services act primarily as a reverse proxy between website visitors and a customer's hosting provider, improving performance and protecting against malicious traffic.
GTLS vs NET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $614.5M |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $-12.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 33.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $614.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $562.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $512.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $479.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $459.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $401.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $378.6M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $-50.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $-35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 74.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 77.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 77.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | -14.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $943.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $6.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $943.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $204.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $147.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $182.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $157.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $254.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $881.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $797.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $190.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | $105.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | 17.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 13.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | $287.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $190.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $167.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $145.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $127.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $74.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $73.6M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $82.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | $39.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | $59.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
NET
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $438.5M | 71% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $176.0M | 29% |
