vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACS Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). CHART INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 4.4%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
GTLS vs PACS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $53.6M | $59.7M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.7% | 3022.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.06 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $981.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.7M | $934.3M |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-138.5M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.1M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5M | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.6M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $49.1M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | 21.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.06 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.23 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.53 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.10 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $366.0M | $197.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.7B | $353.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $946.8M |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $366.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.2M | $355.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $342.3M | $294.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.2M | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.6M | $157.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $247.4M | $73.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.9M | $81.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $353.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $411.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $946.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $871.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $806.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $750.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $709.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $660.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $572.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $128.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.8M | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $66.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | -0.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $202.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.0M | $204.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.0M | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.4M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.6M | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.1M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-95.1M | $58.8M |
| Q4 25 | $66.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 5.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 33.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.91× | 13.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.42× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
PACS
Segment breakdown not available.
