vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Roblox Corp (RBLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Roblox Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.6× Garrett Motion Inc.). Garrett Motion Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs -22.3%, a 31.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roblox Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.2% vs 5.6%). Roblox Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($308.6M vs $78.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Roblox Corp's revenue compounded faster (32.9% CAGR vs -1.3%).

Garrett Motion Inc., formerly Honeywell Transportation Systems and Honeywell Turbo Technologies, is an American company primarily involved in engineering, development and manufacturing of turbochargers and related forced induction systems for ground vehicles from small passenger cars to large trucks and industrial equipment and construction machinery. It originated as part of Garrett AiResearch's Industrial Division in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1954, after which they entered a contract to provide ...

Roblox Corporation is an American video game developer based in San Mateo, California. Founded in 2004 by David Baszucki and Erik Cassel, the company is the developer of Roblox, a game platform, which was released in 2006. As of December 31, 2024, the company employs over 2,400 people.

GTX vs RBLX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RBLX
RBLX
1.6× larger
RBLX
$1.4B
$891.0M
GTX
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RBLX
RBLX
+37.6% gap
RBLX
43.2%
5.6%
GTX
Higher net margin
GTX
GTX
31.8% more per $
GTX
9.4%
-22.3%
RBLX
More free cash flow
RBLX
RBLX
$230.6M more FCF
RBLX
$308.6M
$78.0M
GTX
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RBLX
RBLX
Annualised
RBLX
32.9%
-1.3%
GTX

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Revenue
$891.0M
$1.4B
Net Profit
$84.0M
$-316.0M
Gross Margin
20.8%
77.7%
Operating Margin
11.6%
-25.3%
Net Margin
9.4%
-22.3%
Revenue YoY
5.6%
43.2%
Net Profit YoY
-16.0%
-43.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.42
$-0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$891.0M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$902.0M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$913.0M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$878.0M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$844.0M
$988.2M
Q3 24
$826.0M
$919.0M
Q2 24
$890.0M
$893.5M
Q1 24
$915.0M
$801.3M
Net Profit
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$84.0M
$-316.0M
Q3 25
$77.0M
$-255.6M
Q2 25
$87.0M
$-278.4M
Q1 25
$62.0M
$-215.1M
Q4 24
$100.0M
$-219.6M
Q3 24
$52.0M
$-239.3M
Q2 24
$64.0M
$-205.9M
Q1 24
$66.0M
$-270.6M
Gross Margin
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
20.8%
77.7%
Q3 25
20.6%
78.2%
Q2 25
19.8%
78.2%
Q1 25
20.4%
78.3%
Q4 24
21.6%
77.9%
Q3 24
20.1%
77.7%
Q2 24
20.8%
77.8%
Q1 24
18.8%
77.7%
Operating Margin
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
11.6%
-25.3%
Q3 25
11.3%
-21.8%
Q2 25
11.2%
-29.8%
Q1 25
9.7%
-24.6%
Q4 24
11.7%
-24.7%
Q3 24
9.2%
-30.4%
Q2 24
9.8%
-26.6%
Q1 24
8.9%
-37.7%
Net Margin
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
9.4%
-22.3%
Q3 25
8.5%
-18.8%
Q2 25
9.5%
-25.8%
Q1 25
7.1%
-20.8%
Q4 24
11.8%
-22.2%
Q3 24
6.3%
-26.0%
Q2 24
7.2%
-23.0%
Q1 24
7.2%
-33.8%
EPS (diluted)
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$0.42
$-0.44
Q3 25
$0.38
$-0.37
Q2 25
$0.42
$-0.41
Q1 25
$0.30
$-0.32
Q4 24
$0.46
$-0.32
Q3 24
$0.24
$-0.37
Q2 24
$0.28
$-0.32
Q1 24
$0.28
$-0.43

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$177.0M
$3.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-802.0M
$394.5M
Total Assets
$2.4B
$9.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.98×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$177.0M
$3.1B
Q3 25
$230.0M
$2.9B
Q2 25
$232.0M
$2.6B
Q1 25
$130.0M
$2.7B
Q4 24
$125.0M
$2.4B
Q3 24
$96.0M
$2.3B
Q2 24
$98.0M
$2.4B
Q1 24
$196.0M
$2.4B
Total Debt
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$-802.0M
$394.5M
Q3 25
$-813.0M
$407.6M
Q2 25
$-812.0M
$353.2M
Q1 25
$-700.0M
$310.7M
Q4 24
$-673.0M
$221.4M
Q3 24
$-778.0M
$189.9M
Q2 24
$-725.0M
$121.5M
Q1 24
$-735.0M
$71.6M
Total Assets
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$2.4B
$9.6B
Q3 25
$2.4B
$8.6B
Q2 25
$2.4B
$7.8B
Q1 25
$2.3B
$7.5B
Q4 24
$2.3B
$7.2B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$6.7B
Q2 24
$2.2B
$6.5B
Q1 24
$2.4B
$6.3B
Debt / Equity
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
2.98×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
5.48×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$99.0M
$607.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$78.0M
$308.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.8%
21.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
21.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.18×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$341.0M
$1.4B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$99.0M
$607.0M
Q3 25
$100.0M
$546.2M
Q2 25
$158.0M
$199.3M
Q1 25
$56.0M
$443.9M
Q4 24
$131.0M
$184.5M
Q3 24
$67.0M
$247.4M
Q2 24
$126.0M
$151.4M
Q1 24
$84.0M
$238.9M
Free Cash Flow
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
$78.0M
$308.6M
Q3 25
$90.0M
$443.6M
Q2 25
$143.0M
$176.7M
Q1 25
$30.0M
$426.5M
Q4 24
$109.0M
$120.6M
Q3 24
$47.0M
$218.0M
Q2 24
$109.0M
$111.7M
Q1 24
$52.0M
$192.3M
FCF Margin
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
8.8%
21.8%
Q3 25
10.0%
32.6%
Q2 25
15.7%
16.3%
Q1 25
3.4%
41.2%
Q4 24
12.9%
12.2%
Q3 24
5.7%
23.7%
Q2 24
12.2%
12.5%
Q1 24
5.7%
24.0%
Capex Intensity
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
2.4%
21.1%
Q3 25
1.1%
7.5%
Q2 25
1.6%
2.1%
Q1 25
3.0%
1.7%
Q4 24
2.6%
6.5%
Q3 24
2.4%
3.2%
Q2 24
1.9%
4.4%
Q1 24
3.5%
5.8%
Cash Conversion
GTX
GTX
RBLX
RBLX
Q4 25
1.18×
Q3 25
1.30×
Q2 25
1.82×
Q1 25
0.90×
Q4 24
1.31×
Q3 24
1.29×
Q2 24
1.97×
Q1 24
1.27×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons