vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Seneca Foods Corp (SENEB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Garrett Motion Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($891.0M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.8× Seneca Foods Corp). Garrett Motion Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 8.8%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Garrett Motion Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.6% vs 1.1%). Garrett Motion Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($78.0M vs $22.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Seneca Foods Corp's revenue compounded faster (77.1% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Garrett Motion Inc., formerly Honeywell Transportation Systems and Honeywell Turbo Technologies, is an American company primarily involved in engineering, development and manufacturing of turbochargers and related forced induction systems for ground vehicles from small passenger cars to large trucks and industrial equipment and construction machinery. It originated as part of Garrett AiResearch's Industrial Division in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1954, after which they entered a contract to provide ...
Seneca Foods Corporation is an American food processor and distributor headquartered in Fairport, New York, United States. Seneca Foods Corporation conducts its business almost entirely in food packaging, which contributed to about 98% of the company's fiscal year net sales in 2017. Canned vegetables represented 65%, fruit products represented 23%, frozen fruit and vegetables represented 11% and fruit chip products represented 1% of the total food packaging net sales. Non-food packaging sales...
GTX vs SENEB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $891.0M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $84.0M | $44.8M |
| Gross Margin | 20.8% | 16.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 11.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 8.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.6% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.0% | 205.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $6.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $891.0M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $902.0M | $460.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $913.0M | $297.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $878.0M | $345.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.0M | $502.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $826.0M | $425.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $890.0M | $304.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $915.0M | $162.2M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.0M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.0M | $601.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $6.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $4.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $2.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $2.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $1.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $1.80 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.28 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $177.0M | $33.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $275.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-802.0M | $713.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $177.0M | $33.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.0M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $232.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.0M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.0M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $275.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $280.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $293.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $416.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $572.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $604.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-802.0M | $713.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-813.0M | $672.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-812.0M | $644.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-700.0M | $633.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-673.0M | $612.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-778.0M | $598.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-725.0M | $588.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-735.0M | $582.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.0M | $31.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.0M | $22.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.8% | 4.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.18× | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $341.0M | $168.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.0M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $158.0M | $53.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.0M | $91.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.0M | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $81.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.0M | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.18× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.82× | 3.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 152.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | 8.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.29× | 5.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.97× | 3.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTX
Segment breakdown not available.
SENEB
| Canned Vegetables | $430.2M | 85% |
| Fruit | $34.6M | 7% |
| Frozen | $29.3M | 6% |
| Manufactured Product Other | $10.8M | 2% |
| Snack | $3.4M | 1% |
