vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GETTY REALTY CORP (GTY) and MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP (MFIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($70.6M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.2× GETTY REALTY CORP). GETTY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 46.0% vs 17.3%, a 28.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs 10.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 7.6%).
Getty Realty Corp is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It owns, leases, and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets, primarily consisting of convenience stores, fuel stations, and adjacent retail locations across U.S. states, serving tenants across retail and energy sectors.
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (MMFSL) is an Indian rural non-banking financial company headquartered in Mumbai. It is amongst the top tractor financers in India, with 1000+ offices across the country.
GTY vs MFIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $70.6M |
| Net Profit | $26.6M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 66.1% | 29.3% |
| Net Margin | 46.0% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.5% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 80.1% | 20.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.5M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.6M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.3M | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.3M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.0M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $53.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9M | $51.0M |
| Q1 26 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $7.1M |
| Q1 26 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.6% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | 24.3% |
| Q1 26 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 44.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 13.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.7M | $136.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $216.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $408.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.4M | $136.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $131.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5M | $98.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $87.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $995.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $934.6M | $215.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $919.2M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $901.4M | $199.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $904.3M | $232.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $833.9M | $232.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $838.4M | $230.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $397.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $982.4M | $389.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $961.1M | $380.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $962.1M | $370.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $963.4M | $362.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $951.0M | $354.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.93× | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.94× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | 0.65× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.7M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.5M | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $27.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 209.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 244.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.71× | 10.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | 8.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.48× | -0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.94× | 3.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.85× | 10.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.26× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.78× | 3.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
