vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GULF RESOURCES, INC. (GURE) and John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (JMSB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.8M vs $9.0M, roughly 1.9× GULF RESOURCES, INC.). John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.3% vs -394.3%, a 430.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs -37.1%).
EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company that operates through its wholly owned subsidiary John Marshall Bank. It provides a full suite of commercial and consumer banking products including deposit accounts, commercial loans, residential mortgages, and personal financial services, primarily serving retail customers and small-to-mid-sized businesses across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region.
GURE vs JMSB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $16.8M |
| Net Profit | $-35.7M | $6.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -394.3% | 36.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 303.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -921.1% | 26.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-35.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-773.8K | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -394.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $150.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.5M | $268.1M |
| Total Assets | $131.9M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $163.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $116.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $122.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $177.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $182.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $80.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $80.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $265.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $259.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $253.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $253.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $246.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $243.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $235.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-559.3K | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 134.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GURE
| Bromine | $8.1M | 89% |
| Shandong Shouguang Shenrunfa Marine Chemical Company Limited | $1.4M | 15% |
JMSB
| Net Interest Income | $16.5M | 98% |
| Noninterest Income | $284.0K | 2% |
