vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GULF RESOURCES, INC. (GURE) and Soluna Holdings, Inc (SLNH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GULF RESOURCES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $8.4M, roughly 1.1× Soluna Holdings, Inc). Soluna Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -284.7% vs -394.3%, a 109.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GULF RESOURCES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (303.4% vs 11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Soluna Holdings, Inc's revenue compounded faster (-8.8% CAGR vs -37.1%).
EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.
GURE vs SLNH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.0M | $8.4M |
| Net Profit | $-35.7M | $-24.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | -92.5% |
| Net Margin | -394.3% | -284.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 303.4% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -921.1% | -233.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.9M | $10.1M |
| Q3 25 | $-35.7M | $-24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-773.8K | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-58.8M | $-6.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -360.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -39.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 42.4% |
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | -92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | -107.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -120.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -426.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -119.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -38.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | -114.7% | -23.9% |
| Q3 25 | -394.3% | -284.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.3% | -119.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -127.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -483.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -95.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -112.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -41.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | -855.6% | -66.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.62 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $13.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $107.5M | $14.5M |
| Total Assets | $131.9M | $152.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $72.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $-19.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $205.2M | $26.5M |
| Q3 25 | $131.9M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.6M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $97.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $226.7M | $91.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.7M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -81.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 55.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-559.3K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-177.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-42.6M | $1.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | -81.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -156.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -168.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -78.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 12.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 139.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 107.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GURE
| Bromine | $8.1M | 89% |
| Shandong Shouguang Shenrunfa Marine Chemical Company Limited | $1.4M | 15% |
SLNH
| Data Hosting Revenue | $5.3M | 62% |
| Cryptocurrency Mining Revenue | $2.8M | 33% |
| Other | $389.0K | 5% |
