vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC (GVA) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($912.5M vs $804.2M, roughly 1.1× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs -4.0%, a 28.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRANITE CONSTRUCTION INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.4% vs 26.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (25.9% CAGR vs -8.2%).
Granite Construction Inc. is a civil construction company and aggregate producer, a member of the S&P 600 Index based and founded in Watsonville, California, and is the parent corporation of Granite Construction Company. The company is both a heavy civil construction contractor and construction aggregate manufacturer, owning or leasing quarries in several Western states for extracting mostly sands, gravel, and crushed stone products. The company was under investigation from the SEC from 2019 ...
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
GVA vs MPWR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $912.5M | $804.2M |
| Net Profit | $-36.4M | $193.2M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | -4.0% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.4% | 26.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.9% | 43.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.96 | $3.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $912.5M | $804.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $751.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $737.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $664.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.5M | $637.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | $621.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $620.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $507.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-36.4M | $193.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.0M | $171.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.9M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.7M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.7M | $135.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.0M | $144.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.9M | $100.4M |
| Q1 26 | 11.2% | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.7% | 55.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 55.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 23.0% |
| Q1 26 | -4.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 201.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.96 | $3.92 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.23 | $3.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.98 | $3.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $2.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.77 | $2.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $25.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.57 | $2.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $2.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $265.7M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $265.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $600.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $547.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $422.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.6M | $862.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $472.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $740.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $739.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $739.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $738.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $993.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $931.7M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
