vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH) and NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP (NTIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.3M vs $13.7M, roughly 1.7× Globavend Holdings Ltd). Globavend Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs 1.0%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globavend Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.7% vs 9.2%). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-479.7K vs $-1.2M).
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
Maxar Technologies Inc., was an American space technology company, specializing in geospatial intelligence, Earth observation, and on-orbit satellite servicing, satellite products, and related services. DigitalGlobe and MDA Holdings Company merged to become Maxar Technologies on October 5, 2017.
GVH vs NTIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $23.3M |
| Net Profit | $450.3K | $237.8K |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 63.7% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.9% | -57.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.01 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $237.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $450.3K | $434.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $561.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $976.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.8K | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.57 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $915.2K | $6.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $72.4M |
| Total Assets | $6.4M | $104.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.2K | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $68.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $102.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $89.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $87.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-906.3K | $341.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | $-479.7K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.01× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-1.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $341.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $609.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-906.3K | $803.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-256.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-479.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-171.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $293.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $869.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-730.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.01× | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GVH
Segment breakdown not available.
NTIC
| Inside The USA To Unaffiliated Customers | $7.5M | 32% |
| Natur Tec | $6.0M | 26% |
| Acobal | $3.6M | 15% |
| Other | $2.7M | 12% |
| BR | $2.1M | 9% |
| Zerust OY | $1.4M | 6% |
