vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH) and SCYNEXIS INC (SCYX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCYNEXIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.6M vs $13.7M, roughly 1.4× Globavend Holdings Ltd). SCYNEXIS INC runs the higher net margin — 65.7% vs 3.3%, a 62.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SCYNEXIS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1808.5% vs 63.7%).
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
SCYNEXIS Inc. is a biotechnology company focused on developing innovative antifungal therapies to address unmet medical needs for difficult-to-treat fungal infections. It targets hospital and specialty care markets, with key product candidates serving immunocompromised patients and other high-risk groups.
GVH vs SCYX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $18.6M |
| Net Profit | $450.3K | $12.3M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 56.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 65.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 63.7% | 1808.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.9% | 376.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.01 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $334.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $257.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $977.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $660.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $736.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $450.3K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.8K | $411.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2516.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -701.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -3350.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1563.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1255.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -692.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2572.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -504.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -2097.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -425.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1964.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.01 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.57 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $915.2K | $40.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $49.4M |
| Total Assets | $6.4M | $59.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.2K | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $80.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $50.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $74.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $67.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $118.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-906.3K | $18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.01× | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-906.3K | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $765.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-256.6K | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-730.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.29× | -9.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GVH
Segment breakdown not available.
SCYX
| Glaxosmithkline Intellectual Property | $17.2M | 92% |
| Products | $1.4M | 8% |
