vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globavend Holdings Ltd (GVH) and UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES (UBFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Globavend Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.7M vs $13.5M, roughly 1.0× UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs 3.3%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Globavend Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.7% vs 13.6%). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.8M vs $-1.2M).
Globavend Holdings Ltd is a provider of smart unattended retail solutions, focusing on the design, supply, and operation of intelligent vending machines. It primarily serves markets across Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, offering end-to-end services including hardware manufacturing, inventory management software, and after-sales support to clients in retail, FMCG, and workplace service segments.
United Security Bancshares is a bank holding company headquartered in Fresno, California. It operates 11 branches.
GVH vs UBFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.7M | $13.5M |
| Net Profit | $450.3K | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 31.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 63.7% | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -49.9% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $6.01 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $450.3K | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.8K | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 32.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.01 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.57 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $915.2K | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.7M | $139.7M |
| Total Assets | $6.4M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $915.2K | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $216.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $168.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $132.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $130.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $127.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $124.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-906.3K | $22.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | 146.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.01× | 6.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-906.3K | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-256.6K | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-730.0K | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 156.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.01× | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.29× | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
