vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Linde plc (LIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Water Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5M vs $8.8M, roughly 1.5× Linde plc). On growth, Linde plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.2% vs 2.2%). Linde plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($898.0K vs $-15.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Global Water Resources, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.0% CAGR vs -96.7%).
Canadian Natural Resources Limited, or CNRL or Canadian Natural is a senior Canadian oil and natural gas company that operates primarily in the Western Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, with offshore operations in the United Kingdom sector of the North Sea, and offshore Côte d'Ivoire and Gabon. The company, which is headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, has the largest undeveloped base in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. It is the largest indepe...
Linde is a global multinational chemical company and the world's largest industrial gas supplier by market share and revenue. Founded by German scientist and engineer Carl von Linde in 1879 in Wiesbaden, Germany, the company is now headquartered in Woking, United Kingdom, and registered in Ireland as Linde plc. Linde plc was formed in 2018 through the merger of Linde AG and Praxair, which was founded in 1907 in the United States as Linde Air Products Company.
GWRS vs LIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.5M | $8.8M |
| Net Profit | $-963.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -317.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $3.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.5M | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3M | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $8.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-963.0K | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $591.0K | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $443.0K | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 26.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $3.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $4.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $3.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $3.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $3.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.12 | $3.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $3.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $133.7M | $24.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $86.6M | $40.1M |
| Total Assets | $482.9M | $86.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.54× | 0.62× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1M | $4.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $133.7M | $20.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.5M | $15.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.1M | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $40.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $38.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $38.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | $38.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $38.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.6M | $38.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.8M | $39.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.6M | $38.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $86.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $482.9M | $86.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.7M | $86.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.4M | $86.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.9M | $82.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $405.1M | $80.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $402.9M | $82.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.5M | $80.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.54× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.49× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.47× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.50× | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.0M | $898.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -110.8% | 10.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 130.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-47.2M | $4.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $898.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.8M | $954.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.7M | $891.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-943.0K | $796.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -110.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -132.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.0% | 9.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 130.7% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 91.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 141.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 122.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 99.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.7% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.04× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.84× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.65× | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.52× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | 1.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.18× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
