vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GXO Logistics, Inc. (GXO) and Yatra Online, Inc. (YTRA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GXO Logistics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $474, roughly 7394802.8× Yatra Online, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Yatra Online, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (96.7% CAGR vs 19.5%).
GXO Logistics, Inc. is an American global contract logistics company that manages outsourced supply chains and warehousing, and reverse logistics for blue-chip customers in over thirty countries. GXO's corporate headquarters are located in Greenwich, Connecticut, U.S. Its customers include Apple, Nike Inc., Boeing Co., Verizon, Whirlpool, Inditex SA, and Nestle SA.
Yatra Online, Inc. is a leading India-based online travel agency offering flight and hotel bookings, custom holiday packages, bus and train ticketing, and cab rental services. It primarily serves the Indian market, catering to leisure and business travel users via its web portal and mobile applications.
GXO vs YTRA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5B | $474 |
| Net Profit | $43.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -57.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $474 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $294 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $308 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $330 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-96.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-37.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.23 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.81 | $-0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $854.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $12.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.88× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $854.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $339.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $413.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $548.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $469.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $423.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $92.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | $154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.89× | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.53× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $170.0M | $150 |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $115.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $110.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $232.0M | $150 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $189 | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.0M | $8 | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | -1344295.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 238011.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
