vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GYRE THERAPEUTICS, INC. (GYRE) and PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. (MYPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($55.4M vs $37.2M, roughly 1.5× GYRE THERAPEUTICS, INC.). GYRE THERAPEUTICS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -3.7% vs -24.7%, a 21.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GYRE THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.4% vs -18.3%). PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.6M vs $-5.8M). Over the past eight quarters, GYRE THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (17.0% CAGR vs -15.6%).
GYRE Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to developing novel targeted therapies for hard-to-treat hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. It focuses on precision oncology to address unmet patient needs, with operations primarily based in North America.
PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. develops and publishes free-to-play social and casual casino games for mobile, desktop and social platforms. It operates a loyalty rewards program that lets players redeem in-game achievements for real-world benefits including travel, dining and event tickets, serving markets across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific.
GYRE vs MYPS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.2M | $55.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-13.7M |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.3% | -17.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.7% | -24.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 33.4% | -18.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -340.1% | 38.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $37.2M | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.6M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.8M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1M | $62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.9M | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $71.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $569.0K | $-22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $-567.0K |
| Q4 25 | 95.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 94.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 95.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 95.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 95.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 96.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 96.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | -13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.7% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.4M | $104.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $106.0M | $227.9M |
| Total Assets | $166.1M | $290.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.0M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | $112.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.9M | $107.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.1M | $106.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.4M | $127.0M |
| Q4 25 | $106.0M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.9M | $238.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $245.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.1M | $244.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.3M | $244.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $265.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.6M | $288.4M |
| Q4 25 | $166.1M | $290.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.4M | $299.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.6M | $316.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.8M | $313.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.4M | $323.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.2M | $330.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.9M | $333.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.0M | $357.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.6M | $3.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.8M | $3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.5% | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-180.0K | $25.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-129.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-251.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | -15.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
