vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyatt Hotels Corp (H) and Microchip Technology (MCHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyatt Hotels Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.4× Microchip Technology). Microchip Technology runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs -1.1%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyatt Hotels Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs -72.2%). Microchip Technology produced more free cash flow last quarter ($242.8M vs $236.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Microchip Technology's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs 2.2%).
Hyatt Hotels Corporation, commonly known as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, is an American multinational hospitality company headquartered in the Riverside Plaza area of Chicago that manages and franchises luxury and business hotels, resorts, and vacation properties. Hyatt Hotels & Resorts is one of the businesses managed by the Pritzker family. Hyatt has more than 1350 hotels and all-inclusive properties in 69 countries, across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
Microchip Technology Incorporated is an American publicly traded semiconductor corporation that manufactures microcontroller, mixed-signal, analog, and Flash-IP integrated circuits.
H vs MCHP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-20.0M | $144.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | -1.1% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | -72.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.3% | 8.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $970.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $144.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-20.0M | $62.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.0M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.0M | $-154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.0M | $-53.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $471.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.0M | $129.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 17.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.20 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.51 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.63 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.46 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $813.0M | $240.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | $6.4B |
| Total Assets | $14.0B | $14.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $813.0M | $250.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.0M | $236.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $912.0M | $566.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $771.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $286.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $315.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $6.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.0B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7B | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9B | $15.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0B | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $15.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8B | $15.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.85× | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $313.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $236.0M | $242.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | 18.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $871.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | $341.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $88.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-67.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.0M | $205.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.0M | $271.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.0M | $377.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $242.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.0M | $318.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-111.0M | $257.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0M | $191.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-64.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.0M | $304.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.04× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | 2.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
H
| Other | $627.0M | 35% |
| Rooms Revenue | $326.0M | 18% |
| Net Fees | $290.0M | 16% |
| Distribution Segment | $177.0M | 10% |
| Franchise And Other Fees | $114.0M | 6% |
| Base Management Fees | $112.0M | 6% |
| Incentive Management Fees | $81.0M | 5% |
| Other Owned And Leased Hotel Revenue | $41.0M | 2% |
| Contra Revenue | $17.0M | 1% |
| Other Revenues | $4.0M | 0% |
MCHP
Segment breakdown not available.
