vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyatt Hotels Corp (H) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyatt Hotels Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -1.1%, a 22.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyatt Hotels Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $236.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Hyatt Hotels Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.2% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Hyatt Hotels Corporation, commonly known as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, is an American multinational hospitality company headquartered in the Riverside Plaza area of Chicago that manages and franchises luxury and business hotels, resorts, and vacation properties. Hyatt Hotels & Resorts is one of the businesses managed by the Pritzker family. Hyatt has more than 1350 hotels and all-inclusive properties in 69 countries, across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
H vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-20.0M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -1.1% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.3% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-20.0M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.0M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $471.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.0M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $522.0M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.6% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.7% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.5% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.20 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.51 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.63 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.46 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.93 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $813.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $14.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $813.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $749.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $912.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $14.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $313.0M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $236.0M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-67.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.0M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.0M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.0M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $242.0M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $236.0M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.0M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-111.0M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-64.0M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $208.0M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.65× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.04× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
H
| Other | $627.0M | 35% |
| Rooms Revenue | $326.0M | 18% |
| Net Fees | $290.0M | 16% |
| Distribution Segment | $177.0M | 10% |
| Franchise And Other Fees | $114.0M | 6% |
| Base Management Fees | $112.0M | 6% |
| Incentive Management Fees | $81.0M | 5% |
| Other Owned And Leased Hotel Revenue | $41.0M | 2% |
| Contra Revenue | $17.0M | 1% |
| Other Revenues | $4.0M | 0% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
