vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hasbro (HAS) and STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. (STRL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hasbro is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $755.6M, roughly 1.9× STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.). Hasbro runs the higher net margin — 13.9% vs 11.6%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (51.5% vs 31.3%). Hasbro produced more free cash flow last quarter ($389.5M vs $159.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Hasbro's revenue compounded faster (38.2% CAGR vs 31.0%).
Hasbro, Inc. is an American multinational toy manufacturing and entertainment holding company founded on December 6, 1923 by Henry, Hillel and Herman Hassenfeld and is incorporated and headquartered in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Hasbro owns the trademarks and products of Kenner, Milton Bradley, Parker Brothers, and Wizards of the Coast, among others. As of August 2020, over 81.5% of its shares were held by large financial institutions.
Sterling & Wilson is an Indian multinational engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) company headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra. It operates across multiple sectors including renewable energy, data centers, diesel power generation, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) services. The company has delivered projects in over 30 countries, with execution teams located across Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Australia.
HAS vs STRL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $755.6M |
| Net Profit | $201.6M | $87.6M |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 15.9% |
| Net Margin | 13.9% | 11.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 31.3% | 51.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 687.8% | -22.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.46 | $2.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $755.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $689.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $980.8M | $614.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.1M | $430.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $498.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $593.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $995.3M | $582.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $757.3M | $440.4M |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $87.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.2M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-855.8M | $71.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.6M | $39.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.3M | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $223.2M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.2M | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | 68.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.0% | 17.5% |
| Q4 25 | 20.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.3% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -87.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.46 | $2.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $2.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.10 | $2.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $3.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.59 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.99 | $1.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $1.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $390.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $565.5M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $390.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $306.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $638.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $664.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $540.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $480.4M |
| Q4 25 | $565.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.7M | $881.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $805.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $808.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $716.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $670.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $644.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $403.2M | $186.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $389.5M | $159.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.9% | 21.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.00× | 2.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $829.9M | $362.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $403.2M | $186.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.6M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.3M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.1M | $84.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.8M | $174.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.5M | $152.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.3M | $121.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.8M | $49.6M |
| Q4 25 | $389.5M | $159.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.9M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3M | $67.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.8M | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.0M | $138.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.4M | $92.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $132.0M | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | 26.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.4% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 2.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | 2.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.35× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.05× | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HAS
| Grow Brands | $1.1B | 75% |
| Optimize Brands | $188.7M | 13% |
| Digital And Licensing Gaming | $135.7M | 9% |
| Class Of Principal Product Family Brands | $13.1M | 1% |
| Filmand TV | $2.4M | 0% |
STRL
| Lump Sum | $464.9M | 62% |
| Heavy Highway | $99.6M | 13% |
| Residential Construction | $70.4M | 9% |
| Road And Highway Builders LLC | $52.4M | 7% |
| Other Revenue | $36.6M | 5% |
| Aviation | $16.6M | 2% |
| Commercial | $11.4M | 2% |
| Related Party | $600.0K | 0% |
