vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.8M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.9× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -46.8%, a 51.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs 5.9%). Over the past eight quarters, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -2.4%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
HASI vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.8M | $64.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.1% |
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 116.3% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $95.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $234.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
