vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Iridium Communications Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.1M vs $114.8M, roughly 1.9× HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.). Iridium Communications Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -46.8%, a 56.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Iridium Communications Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 4.2%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
HASI vs IRDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $219.1M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $219.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $226.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $214.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $213.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $201.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $96.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $93.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $159.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $63.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $462.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $473.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $518.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $576.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $786.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $104.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $79.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | 5.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | 2.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HASI
Segment breakdown not available.
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
