vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and LIFETIME BRANDS, INC (LCUT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LIFETIME BRANDS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($204.1M vs $114.8M, roughly 1.8× HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.). LIFETIME BRANDS, INC runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs -46.8%, a 55.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LIFETIME BRANDS, INC's revenue compounded faster (19.8% CAGR vs 4.2%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
Yum! Brands, Inc. is an American multinational fast food corporation. It was formed in 1977 as a subsidiary of PepsiCo, after the company acquired KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell. PepsiCo divested the brands in 1997, and these consolidated as Yum!. The company operates KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, Habit Burger & Grill, and several technology companies.
HASI vs LCUT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $204.1M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $18.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | -5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $204.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $171.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $131.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $140.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $215.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $183.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $141.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.8M | $142.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $-39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $344.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $-6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.5% |
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | -30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | -12.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 116.3% | -4.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $-1.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $135.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $202.3M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $572.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.67× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $135.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $142.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $202.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $184.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $185.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $225.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $229.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $220.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $219.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $223.7M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $572.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $581.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $551.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $594.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $634.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $668.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $602.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | $3.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | 2.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -65.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HASI
Segment breakdown not available.
LCUT
| Kitchenware | $114.3M | 56% |
| Tableware | $41.7M | 20% |
| Home Solutions | $29.4M | 14% |
| Other | $18.8M | 9% |
