vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAXLINEAR, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.2M vs $114.8M, roughly 1.2× HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.). MAXLINEAR, INC runs the higher net margin — -32.9% vs -46.8%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 13.3%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 4.2%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
HASI vs MXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $137.2M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | -32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | 43.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | -203.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $-0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $137.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $136.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $95.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $92.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $-57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $-39.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -32.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | -48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | -44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | -44.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -32.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | -36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | -51.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | -62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | -93.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | -42.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | $61.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $123.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $454.2M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $771.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $111.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $102.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $185.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $464.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $488.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $493.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $516.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $556.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $617.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $771.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $855.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $864.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $895.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $973.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
