vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. (PTCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PTC THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($164.7M vs $114.8M, roughly 1.4× HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.). HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -46.8% vs -82.0%, a 35.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs -22.7%). Over the past eight quarters, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -11.5%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
PTC Therapeutics, Inc. is a US pharmaceutical company focused on the development of orally administered small molecule drugs and gene therapy which regulate gene expression by targeting post-transcriptional control (PTC) mechanisms in orphan diseases.
HASI vs PTCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $164.7M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $-135.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | -43.3% |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | -82.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | -22.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | -104.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $-1.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $178.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $213.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $186.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.8M | $210.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $-135.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $-64.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $866.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $-65.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $-106.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $-99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $-91.6M |
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | -43.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | 82.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | -76.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | -27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | -82.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | 73.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | -30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | -54.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | -53.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 116.3% | -43.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $10.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-1.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $-1.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $-205.3M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $884.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $-205.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $-155.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $-206.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $-185.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $-980.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $-893.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | $-34.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $702.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $-66.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $-58.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $870.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $-77.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $-71.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $70.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-69.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-59.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $868.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-77.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-78.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 73.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | -4.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | 1.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
