vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $114.8M, roughly 1.7× HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -46.8%, a 49.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.3% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -3.3%).
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (HASI) is a specialized investment firm focused on sustainable infrastructure assets covering renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable real estate and low-carbon utility segments. It primarily operates in North American markets, providing long-term capital to eligible sustainable projects and delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors through recurring cash flows from operational underlying assets.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
HASI vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.8M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-53.8M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -57.4% | — |
| Net Margin | -46.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.3% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -176.7% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.1M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.7M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.9M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.0M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.5M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-53.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.4M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.6M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.1M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.6M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.5M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -57.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 84.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -46.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 114.9% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $110.2M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.2M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.8M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.1M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $167.3M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.3M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.8M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.46× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.94× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.