vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($403.4M vs $255.2M, roughly 1.6× Hayward Holdings, Inc.). Hayward Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.2% vs 2.0%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.1% CAGR vs -5.3%).

Bartlett-Hayward Company was an American metalworking company with large foundry, fabrication, and construction business lines, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Founded in the 1830s, it was independent until 1925 and since 1927 was owned by Koppers, of which it remained a division long afterward.

Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is an American sports holding company based in New York City.

HAYW vs MSGS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MSGS
MSGS
1.6× larger
MSGS
$403.4M
$255.2M
HAYW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MSGS
MSGS
+1.2% gap
MSGS
12.8%
11.5%
HAYW
Higher net margin
HAYW
HAYW
7.1% more per $
HAYW
9.2%
2.0%
MSGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MSGS
MSGS
Annualised
MSGS
-3.1%
-5.3%
HAYW

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Revenue
$255.2M
$403.4M
Net Profit
$23.4M
$8.2M
Gross Margin
46.5%
Operating Margin
16.6%
5.5%
Net Margin
9.2%
2.0%
Revenue YoY
11.5%
12.8%
Net Profit YoY
63.0%
641.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.34

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$255.2M
Q4 25
$349.4M
$403.4M
Q3 25
$244.3M
$39.5M
Q2 25
$299.6M
$204.0M
Q1 25
$228.8M
$424.2M
Q4 24
$327.1M
$357.8M
Q3 24
$227.6M
$53.3M
Q2 24
$284.4M
$227.3M
Net Profit
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$23.4M
Q4 25
$68.4M
$8.2M
Q3 25
$24.0M
$-8.8M
Q2 25
$44.8M
$-1.8M
Q1 25
$14.3M
$-14.2M
Q4 24
$54.7M
$1.1M
Q3 24
$16.5M
$-7.5M
Q2 24
$37.6M
$25.5M
Gross Margin
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
46.5%
Q4 25
40.7%
Q3 25
51.2%
Q2 25
52.7%
Q1 25
49.5%
Q4 24
51.4%
Q3 24
49.7%
Q2 24
51.0%
Operating Margin
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
16.6%
Q4 25
25.0%
5.5%
Q3 25
16.8%
-69.5%
Q2 25
23.8%
-11.1%
Q1 25
14.6%
7.6%
Q4 24
23.4%
3.7%
Q3 24
14.7%
-15.5%
Q2 24
23.9%
23.0%
Net Margin
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
9.2%
Q4 25
19.6%
2.0%
Q3 25
9.8%
-22.3%
Q2 25
15.0%
-0.9%
Q1 25
6.3%
-3.4%
Q4 24
16.7%
0.3%
Q3 24
7.3%
-14.1%
Q2 24
13.2%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$0.11
Q4 25
$0.31
$0.34
Q3 25
$0.11
$-0.37
Q2 25
$0.20
$-0.08
Q1 25
$0.06
$-0.59
Q4 24
$0.26
$0.05
Q3 24
$0.07
$-0.31
Q2 24
$0.17
$1.07

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$230.7M
$81.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$11.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.6B
$-282.1M
Total Assets
$3.1B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$230.7M
Q4 25
$399.1M
$81.3M
Q3 25
$448.3M
$48.6M
Q2 25
$365.1M
$144.6M
Q1 25
$181.3M
$96.5M
Q4 24
$196.6M
$107.8M
Q3 24
$274.2M
$52.3M
Q2 24
$215.1M
$89.1M
Total Debt
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$11.1M
Q4 25
$943.5M
Q3 25
$947.7M
Q2 25
$949.1M
Q1 25
$950.4M
Q4 24
$950.6M
Q3 24
$959.9M
Q2 24
$959.8M
Stockholders' Equity
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$-282.1M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$-294.2M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$-281.4M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$-283.4M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$-273.1M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$-277.5M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$-266.3M
Total Assets
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$3.1B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
0.59×
Q3 25
0.62×
Q2 25
0.63×
Q1 25
0.66×
Q4 24
0.67×
Q3 24
0.70×
Q2 24
0.71×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-150.6M
$32.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$31.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-6.45×
3.94×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-480.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
$-150.6M
Q4 25
$-26.9M
$32.4M
Q3 25
$94.6M
$-85.0M
Q2 25
$194.2M
$49.7M
Q1 25
$-5.8M
$6.3M
Q4 24
$-63.7M
$61.8M
Q3 24
$65.9M
$-26.2M
Q2 24
$287.0M
$108.4M
Free Cash Flow
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-35.8M
$31.6M
Q3 25
$87.2M
$-85.3M
Q2 25
$187.3M
$49.4M
Q1 25
$-11.4M
$3.9M
Q4 24
$-70.4M
$61.2M
Q3 24
$59.1M
$-26.5M
Q2 24
$282.3M
$108.0M
FCF Margin
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-10.3%
7.8%
Q3 25
35.7%
-216.3%
Q2 25
62.5%
24.2%
Q1 25
-5.0%
0.9%
Q4 24
-21.5%
17.1%
Q3 24
26.0%
-49.7%
Q2 24
99.3%
47.5%
Capex Intensity
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.5%
0.2%
Q3 25
3.0%
0.9%
Q2 25
2.3%
0.2%
Q1 25
2.4%
0.6%
Q4 24
2.1%
0.1%
Q3 24
3.0%
0.7%
Q2 24
1.7%
0.2%
Cash Conversion
HAYW
HAYW
MSGS
MSGS
Q1 26
-6.45×
Q4 25
-0.39×
3.94×
Q3 25
3.94×
Q2 25
4.34×
Q1 25
-0.41×
Q4 24
-1.16×
55.61×
Q3 24
4.00×
Q2 24
7.64×
4.25×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HAYW
HAYW

Segment breakdown not available.

MSGS
MSGS

Event Related$167.2M41%
Media Rights$122.3M30%
Sponsorship Signage And Suite Licenses$98.5M24%
League Distribution$15.4M4%

Related Comparisons