vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECK RESOURCES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $2.0B, roughly 3.1× Hudbay Minerals Inc.).
Hudbay Minerals Inc. is a Canadian mining company that produces copper, gold, silver, zinc, and molybdenum. In 2024, the company produced 137,943 tonnes of copper, 332,240 ounces of gold, 3,983,851 ounces of silver, 33,339 tonnes of zinc, and 1,323 tonnes of molybdenum. In 2024, copper sales represented 57% of revenue, gold sales represented 33% of revenue, and zinc sales represented 4% of revenue.
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
HBM vs TECK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $6.3B |
| Net Profit | $67.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 17.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $525.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $67.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.5% | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
