vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. (HCC) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($384.0M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.4× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 0.7%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.1% vs -16.5%).
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (ticker HCC) is a U.S.-headquartered mining enterprise that produces and distributes high-grade metallurgical coal, a key raw material for steel production. It serves steel manufacturers and industrial clients across core markets including North America, Europe, and Asia.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
HCC vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $384.0M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $23.0M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 29.1% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1919.5% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $384.0M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $297.5M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.9M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.5M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $503.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.1% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.62 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $300.0M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $154.3M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $300.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $383.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.9M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $583.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $709.0M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $693.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $154.3M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.9M | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.8M | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.3M | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $153.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.08× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.1M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.31× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $76.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.0M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.31× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.70× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.08× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCC
| Mining Segment | $373.6M | 97% |
| Other | $10.4M | 3% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.