vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. (HCC) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($458.6M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.8× PicoCELA Inc.). WARRIOR MET COAL, INC. runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -125.2%, a 141.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (ticker HCC) is a U.S.-headquartered mining enterprise that produces and distributes high-grade metallurgical coal, a key raw material for steel production. It serves steel manufacturers and industrial clients across core markets including North America, Europe, and Asia.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
HCC vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $458.6M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $72.3M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 52.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.37 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $458.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $384.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $297.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.9M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $72.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.2M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.37 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.2M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $154.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $233.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $300.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $383.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.9M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $583.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $709.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $154.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $154.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.70× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.08× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCC
| Sales | $448.5M | 98% |
| Other revenues | $10.1M | 2% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
