vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HACKETT GROUP, INC. (HCKT) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nine Energy Service, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.2M vs $68.8M, roughly 1.9× HACKETT GROUP, INC.). HACKETT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 6.2% vs -14.5%, a 20.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nine Energy Service, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.5% vs -11.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.6% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Hackett Limited is a British multi-channel retailer of clothing for men and boys, with a broad range of apparel and accessories. It was founded in 1983 in London, England. As of June 2019, the company had 160 stores globally, with its flagship store at 14 Savile Row in London. It is owned by both Lebanese holding company M1 Group and American L Capital Asia
Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving approximately 3.9 million electricity customers and 2.2 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states as of mid-2025. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.
HCKT vs NINE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $68.8M | $132.2M |
| Net Profit | $4.3M | $-19.2M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | -4.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.2% | -14.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.6% | -6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.2% | -117.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.17 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $68.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.8M | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.1M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.9M | $150.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.2M | $141.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.8M | $138.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.7M | $132.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $-14.0M |
| Q1 26 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | -1.1% |
| Q1 26 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | -10.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.31 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $78.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $66.0M | $-115.0M |
| Total Assets | $204.4M | $339.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | $78.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.1M | $-115.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.6M | $-95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.8M | $-81.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.4M | $-72.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | $-66.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.9M | $-57.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.2M | $-49.7M |
| Q1 26 | $204.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.4M | $339.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $200.7M | $340.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.5M | $361.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $191.8M | $359.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.3M | $360.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.8M | $353.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.5M | $381.7M |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-23.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $12.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | $10.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCKT
| Revenue before reimbursements | $36.4M | 53% |
| Other | $32.0M | 47% |
| Reimbursements | $405.0K | 1% |
NINE
| Cement | $52.6M | 40% |
| Tool Revenue | $28.6M | 22% |
| Coiled Tubing | $25.8M | 20% |
| Wireline | $25.1M | 19% |
