vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $135.5M, roughly 2.0× Sezzle Inc.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.9% vs 0.7%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs -16.5%).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
HCM vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $135.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $51.3M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 37.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 41.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $196.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $454.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $212.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
