vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.2× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -16.4%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.5% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-31.3M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
HCM vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $347.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $975.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-106.6M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -10.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $283.0M |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $973.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-325.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $71.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $64.7M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | -7.98× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
