vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and TRIMAS CORP (TRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.1× TRIMAS CORP). TRIMAS CORP runs the higher net margin — 31.9% vs 0.7%, a 31.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRIMAS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.8% vs -16.5%). TRIMAS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.8M vs $3.4M).

HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.

Trimas Corp is a diversified industrial manufacturing enterprise that designs, produces and distributes a wide portfolio of engineered products, including specialized fasteners, aerospace components, custom packaging solutions, and consumer & industrial hardware. It primarily serves aerospace, automotive, construction, consumer goods and industrial sectors, with core operations across North America and selected global markets.

HCM vs TRS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HCM
HCM
1.1× larger
HCM
$270.8M
$256.5M
TRS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TRS
TRS
+20.4% gap
TRS
3.8%
-16.5%
HCM
Higher net margin
TRS
TRS
31.1% more per $
TRS
31.9%
0.7%
HCM
More free cash flow
TRS
TRS
$33.5M more FCF
TRS
$36.8M
$3.4M
HCM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Revenue
$270.8M
$256.5M
Net Profit
$2.0M
$81.7M
Gross Margin
37.7%
12.8%
Operating Margin
-13.2%
5.7%
Net Margin
0.7%
31.9%
Revenue YoY
-16.5%
3.8%
Net Profit YoY
-83.6%
236.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.00
$2.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$256.5M
Q4 25
$270.8M
$-140.0M
Q3 25
$269.3M
Q2 25
$277.7M
$274.8M
Q1 25
$324.5M
$241.7M
Q4 24
$-66.2M
Q3 24
$229.4M
Q2 24
$305.7M
$240.5M
Net Profit
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$81.7M
Q4 25
$2.0M
$81.7M
Q3 25
$9.3M
Q2 25
$455.0M
$16.7M
Q1 25
$11.9M
$12.4M
Q4 24
$5.6M
Q3 24
$2.5M
Q2 24
$25.8M
$10.9M
Gross Margin
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
12.8%
Q4 25
37.7%
Q3 25
12.8%
Q2 25
0.1%
13.8%
Q1 25
48.0%
13.6%
Q4 24
Q3 24
15.4%
Q2 24
41.1%
14.4%
Operating Margin
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
5.7%
Q4 25
-13.2%
Q3 25
6.2%
Q2 25
-1.3%
9.9%
Q1 25
-5.0%
9.0%
Q4 24
Q3 24
3.6%
Q2 24
-9.0%
7.4%
Net Margin
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
31.9%
Q4 25
0.7%
-58.4%
Q3 25
3.5%
Q2 25
163.8%
6.1%
Q1 25
3.7%
5.1%
Q4 24
-8.5%
Q3 24
1.1%
Q2 24
8.4%
4.5%
EPS (diluted)
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$2.03
Q4 25
$0.00
$2.01
Q3 25
$0.23
Q2 25
$0.52
$0.41
Q1 25
$0.01
$0.30
Q4 24
$0.14
Q3 24
$0.06
Q2 24
$0.03
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.4B
$30.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$93.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
$705.6M
Total Assets
$1.8B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.08×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$30.0M
Q4 25
$1.4B
$30.0M
Q3 25
$33.6M
Q2 25
$1.4B
$30.3M
Q1 25
$836.1M
$32.7M
Q4 24
$23.1M
Q3 24
$26.9M
Q2 24
$802.5M
$35.0M
Total Debt
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$93.2M
$469.2M
Q3 25
$407.1M
Q2 25
$93.4M
$424.5M
Q1 25
$82.8M
$434.2M
Q4 24
$398.1M
Q3 24
$409.9M
Q2 24
$82.1M
$427.4M
Stockholders' Equity
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$705.6M
Q4 25
$1.2B
$705.6M
Q3 25
$725.0M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$715.3M
Q1 25
$759.9M
$686.6M
Q4 24
$667.3M
Q3 24
$682.8M
Q2 24
$740.1M
$675.9M
Total Assets
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.08×
0.66×
Q3 25
0.56×
Q2 25
0.08×
0.59×
Q1 25
0.11×
0.63×
Q4 24
0.60×
Q3 24
0.60×
Q2 24
0.11×
0.63×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$8.2M
$117.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$3.4M
$36.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.2%
14.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.8%
18.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.21×
1.44×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-96.2M
$109.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$117.5M
Q4 25
$8.2M
$41.5M
Q3 25
$36.5M
Q2 25
$-72.9M
$30.3M
Q1 25
$40.3M
$9.2M
Q4 24
$27.1M
Q3 24
$22.0M
Q2 24
$-39.8M
$18.4M
Free Cash Flow
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
$36.8M
Q4 25
$3.4M
$36.8M
Q3 25
$22.8M
Q2 25
$-82.2M
$13.2M
Q1 25
$32.5M
$-3.8M
Q4 24
$12.1M
Q3 24
$10.2M
Q2 24
$-49.9M
$7.5M
FCF Margin
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
14.4%
Q4 25
1.2%
-26.3%
Q3 25
8.5%
Q2 25
-29.6%
4.8%
Q1 25
10.0%
-1.6%
Q4 24
-18.3%
Q3 24
4.4%
Q2 24
-16.3%
3.1%
Capex Intensity
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
18.9%
Q4 25
1.8%
-3.4%
Q3 25
5.1%
Q2 25
3.3%
6.2%
Q1 25
2.4%
5.4%
Q4 24
-22.6%
Q3 24
5.2%
Q2 24
3.3%
4.5%
Cash Conversion
HCM
HCM
TRS
TRS
Q1 26
1.44×
Q4 25
4.21×
0.51×
Q3 25
3.92×
Q2 25
-0.16×
1.81×
Q1 25
3.38×
0.74×
Q4 24
4.80×
Q3 24
8.71×
Q2 24
-1.54×
1.68×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons