vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM) and Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Upstart Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($296.1M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.1× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). Upstart Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 0.7%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Upstart Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.2% vs -16.5%). Upstart Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($108.4M vs $3.4M).
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
Upstart is an AI lending platform that partners with banks and credit unions to provide consumer loans using non-traditional variables, such as education and employment, to predict creditworthiness.
HCM vs UPST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $270.8M | $296.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $18.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.2% | 6.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.7% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.5% | 35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.6% | 776.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $270.8M | $296.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $277.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $257.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $324.5M | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.7M | $127.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $127.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.0M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $-54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-64.6M |
| Q4 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.0% | -43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -52.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 163.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -42.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $652.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $93.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $798.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $652.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $489.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $395.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.1M | $599.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $788.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $802.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $798.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $722.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $759.9M | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $633.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $595.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $740.1M | $594.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $612.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.2M | $108.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.4M | $108.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.2% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.21× | 5.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-96.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-122.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.9M | $-120.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-110.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $179.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.8M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $108.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-122.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.2M | $-120.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $179.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.9M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.6% | -46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 110.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.3% | 51.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | 5.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.16× | -21.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
UPST
| Personal Lending Segment | $201.4M | 68% |
| Servicing Fees Net | $39.5M | 13% |
| Servicing Fees | $27.5M | 9% |
| Other | $15.7M | 5% |
| Borrower Fees | $8.4M | 3% |
| Collection Agency Fees | $3.5M | 1% |
