vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hess Midstream LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($404.2M vs $212.0M, roughly 1.9× Warby Parker Inc.). Hess Midstream LP runs the higher net margin — 23.1% vs -2.8%, a 25.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Warby Parker Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.2% vs 2.1%). Hess Midstream LP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($178.9M vs $8.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Hess Midstream LP's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Hess Corporation is an American global independent energy company involved in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. It was formed by the merger of Hess Oil and Chemical and Amerada Petroleum in 1968. Leon Hess was CEO from the early 1960s until 1995, after which his son John B Hess succeeded him as chairman and CEO. The company agreed to be acquired by rival oil company Chevron in October 2023, and the acquisition closed in July 2025.
Warby Parker Inc. is an American eyewear brand and retailer of prescription glasses, contact lenses, and sunglasses, based in New York City. It also offers eye exams. Originally founded in 2010 as an online-only retailer, the company now generates about two-thirds of its revenue from its 276 physical retail stores, 271 of which are in the U.S. and 5 of which are in Canada. The company intends to operate 900 stores. The company has 2.28 million customers; average order value is $263.
HESM vs WRBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $404.2M | $212.0M |
| Net Profit | $93.3M | $-6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | 62.2% | -3.2% |
| Net Margin | 23.1% | -2.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 11.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.5% | 13.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $404.2M | $212.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.9M | $221.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.2M | $214.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $382.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.9M | $190.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $378.5M | $192.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.5M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.6M | $200.0M |
| Q4 25 | $93.3M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.4M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | 62.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.8% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.8% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.4% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $286.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $367.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $720.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | $286.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3M | $254.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3M | $251.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.6M | $238.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $220.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $367.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $369.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $361.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $354.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $329.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $316.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $720.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $706.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $701.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $682.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $676.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $638.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $618.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $592.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $245.6M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $178.9M | $8.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 44.3% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.5% | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $728.2M | $43.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $245.6M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.9M | $40.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.5M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.6M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.3M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $178.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $178.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.4M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.5M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.7% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.65× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.83× | 8.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.84× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.49× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HESM
| Gathering | $217.3M | 54% |
| Processing And Storage | $154.7M | 38% |
| Terminaling And Export | $32.2M | 8% |
WRBY
| Retail | $155.2M | 73% |
| E Commerce | $56.8M | 27% |
