vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) and Research Solutions, Inc. (RSSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Heritage Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.9M vs $11.8M, roughly 1.0× Research Solutions, Inc.). Research Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.6% vs 2.5%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Heritage Global Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs -1.0%). Research Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4M vs $971.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Heritage Global Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.3% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Global Media & Entertainment Limited, trading as Global, is a British media company formed in 2007. It is the owner of the largest commercial radio company in Europe having expanded through a number of historical acquisitions, including Chrysalis Radio, GCap Media, and GMG Radio. Global owns and operates seven core radio brands, all employing a national network strategy, including Capital, Heart, Smooth, Radio X, Gold, Classic FM, and LBC.
Jacobs Solutions Inc. is an American international technical professional services firm based in Dallas. The company provides engineering, technical, professional, and construction services as well as scientific and specialty consulting for a broad range of clients globally, including companies, organizations, and government agencies. Jacobs has consistently ranked No. 1 on both Engineering News-Record (ENR)'s 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 Top 500 Design Firms and Trenchless Technolo...
HGBL vs RSSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.9M | $11.8M |
| Net Profit | $301.0K | $546.9K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 6.3% |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | -1.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 248.3% | 127.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.3M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.2M | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | $301.0K | $546.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.0K | $749.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $216.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-203.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $669.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $76.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.9% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.5M | $12.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.0M | $17.2M |
| Total Assets | $88.4M | $44.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.6M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $67.0M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.4M | $11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | $88.4M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.5M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.7M | $45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.5M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.7M | $40.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.6M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $971.0K | $1.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 11.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.25× | 2.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $843.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $971.0K | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-233.0K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.7% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.6% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.25× | 2.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.10× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.15× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.46× | 13.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.07× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | 26.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HGBL
| Services | $7.9M | 67% |
| Products | $4.0M | 33% |
RSSS
| Transactions | $6.6M | 56% |
| Platforms | $5.2M | 44% |
